Blog Archives
North Korea’s nuclear weapons aren’t the type that bring peace and stability, insist nuclear states
America, China, Russia, France and the UK have insisted that the nuclear weapons being developed by North Korea are the bad ones that bring fear and uncertainty not the good ones that bring peace and stability.
Good nuclear weapons are packed with a combination of rainbows, doves and rose petals that cause widespread hope throughout the world.
Bad nuclear weapons are packed with Marmite, flimsy corner shop carrier bags and Tesco Value Bolognese and cause widespread despair.
The North Korean news agency said the underground test used a smaller, lighter nuclear device with greater explosive force than before, prompting fears that North Korean scientists may have also developed the capability to produce dubstep.
The use of Dubstep, which has been described by music lovers as sounding like a Tyrannosaurus rex being raped by a Transformer, has heightened concerns amongst the international community.
“The development of bad nuclear weapons instead of the nice ones that keep us all safe is a clear and grave violation of UN resolutions,” insisted UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.
“Having the nuclear capability to annihilate the entire planet should only be allowed if your intentions are peaceful.”
North Korea Nuclear test
Foreign Secretary William Hague described North Korea’s actions as a blatant attempt to “outdeterrent our deterrent”.
“What could be more peaceful than having the capability to kill millions of people,” he explained.
“The problem is that the millions of people you have the capability of killing will want to develop their own nuclear weapons so they can kill you back.”
“I can’t imagine what the answer could be.”
via North Korea’s nuclear weapons aren’t the type that bring peace and stability, insist nuclear states.
via North Korea’s nuclear weapons aren’t the type that bring peace and stability, insist nuclear states.
Cannot find Weapons of Mass Destruction
|
|
| The weapons you are looking for are currently unavailable. The country might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your weapons inspectors mandate.Please try the following:Click the Regime change button, or try again later.If you are Barack Obama and typed the country’s name in the address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly. (IRAN).To check your weapons inspector settings, click the UN menu, and then click Weapons Inspector Options. On the Security Council tab, click Consensus. The settings should match those provided by your government or NATO.
If the Security Council has enabled it, The United States of America can examine your country and automatically discover Weapons of Mass Destruction. If you would like to use the CIA to try and discover them, click Some countries require 128 thousand troops to liberate them. Click the Panic menu and then click About US foreign policy to determine what regime they will install. If you are an Old European Country trying to protect your interests, make sure your options are left wide open as long as possible. Click the Tools menu, and then click on League of Nations. On the Advanced tab, scroll to the Head in the Sand section and check settings for your exports to Iran. Click the
|
|
These 
Britian demands Palestinians give up future rights in order to gain recognition now
Sshhhh!! . . . . . . . . Don’t mention the Israeli War Criminals
As usual the Brits end up playing shill for unreasonable Israeli demands
Britain ready to back Palestinian statehood at UN
Britain — a source of so much of the modern Middle East’s woes — claims that they will back the Palestinians if they seek recognition at the UN, BUT only if they are prepared to jettison the rights all other nations have to pursue war criminals:
On Monday night, the government signalled it would change tack and vote yes if the Palestinians modified their application, which is to be debated by the UN general assembly in New York later this week. As a “non-member state”, Palestine would have the same status as the Vatican.
Whitehall officials said the Palestinians were now being asked to refrain from applying for membership of the international criminal court or the international court of justice, which could both be used to pursue war crimes charges or other legal claims against Israel.
Abbas is also being asked to commit to an immediate resumption of peace talks “without preconditions” with Israel. The third condition is that the general assembly’s resolution does not require the UN security council to follow suit.
Whereas France CLAIMS that it will recognise Palestine, apparently without condition. – http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/22/france-palest…21122
So Israeli War Criminals are obviously worried about their future, hiding out from International Courts doesn’t seem to hold the appeal it once might have
